Essays for students
There is a simple reason why higher education should be free: for the sake of equality. If university education were free, every student would have the opportunity to attend if they earned a place at university based on merit, not wealth.
Higher education would not only be seen as the key to the economic rise of 18–24-year-olds in college; we would reduce the unemployment rate by 2 million, and far fewer people would need government assistance. A federal higher education funding program would free states from funding and free up money for other needed services.
We should have free public K-12 education, but our failure to fund higher education means that our economy is unable to compete with other developed countries with free universities. Even if we didn’t make public higher education free, we could slash student debt in this country. It is absurd that millions of Americans, decades after receiving a higher education, are still repaying debt.
If higher education were free, it would help only a small portion of the population that does not need it. If we could afford college to be free, it would help many college students earn their degrees and get out of college and out of student debt before the age of 60.
When you look at today’s world, you can’t stop saying it: hard work is great for people, but education is not a luxury that only the rich and royals can afford. To get a good job, you need good training and qualifications, and these come at a price. The start of an education should be free for all students, especially those who grew up in underprivileged families who never had a chance before.
Given the well-documented history of rising inequality in the US, the claim that children should not receive free education is no longer a moral claim, but a widespread justification for making higher education free — and a moral one at that. Supporters of free education say it should not be intended for a particular group or nation.
Ideas such as affordableness, economic growth, medical discoveries and technological progress are just a few of the benefits of school-free education. When a population is educated, it has advantages for the whole world, leading to more development and human life. This will not happen if education is not affordable and free for families who would like to send their children to secondary school.
There is a long way to go before more schools across the country weigh the pros and cons of affordable education. However, the possibility of offering free training becomes more and more likely over time.
We need education to solve the problem of consuming less gas on the planet, which means less pollution in the world, and the less education we receive, the more we save the planet. Every child should be guaranteed access to equal quality education. This means that every pupil should have the same opportunities to achieve the level of education that they can achieve at the same level in every country.
Universities tend to judge the test scores of their prospective students, not what students learn when they attend them. Students don’t have to worry about their next tuition fees. A joint test survey has been developed, but most schools refuse to publish the results.
President Obama has reaffirmed the need for the US to increase the number of citizens with college degrees, but has done little to support that goal. The World Education University (WEU) is an online university offering free college courses worldwide. The WEU uses online monetization strategies to create a sustainable business model that aims to improve the socioeconomic status of the underserved global population.
In one of the boldest state efforts to expand access to higher education, New Mexico announced plans on Wednesday to make tuition free for all residents of the state regardless of their family income. The move comes at a time when many American families are grappling with the rising costs of higher education and the debate over free public college is creating momentum in state legislative chambers and on podiums of presidential debates. Nearly half the states, including New York, Oregon and Tennessee, provide two- and four-year public colleges for students free of charge.
As the economy has changed over the coming years and years, tuition and training prices have soared across the country. A number of families across the country are financially struggling and have decided to not send their children to the college to get a good education.
The affordability of higher education and the current student debt crisis have been central themes of the president’s political season. Indeed, many candidates have built their campaigns around college costs as a central issue.
On the subject of free education, it is important to discuss this from the perspective of the rich. In an article published in Bloomberg in 2017, the author notes that the concept of “free education” helps the rich over the poor and needy. In the article, the author notes that by making education free for the rich, the government is helping needy and poor students to receive an adequate education.
If education is free (or less expensive) for the rich, poor and needy children will have the opportunity to take advantage of it and become better people.